’50/50′: Odds are, you’ll enjoy it


50/50 (2011)

Directed by Jonathan Levine

8/10  R

Screenwriter Will Reiser was diagnosed with a rare cancer at the age of 25. The good news, that doctors had misjudged the severity of the tumor Reiser had on his spinal column, was followed by news that he still had a long road ahead of him. The first draft of his autobiographical screenplay about his experiences was titled “How I Learned Nothing from Cancer,” but he finally decided on something more mainstream: “50/50.”


Inspired by Reiser’s experiences, Adam (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) learns unexpectedly that he has a tumor on his spine. “What? I don’t smoke. I don’t drink. I recycle.” When he begins having relationship troubles with his girlfriend (Bryce Dallas Howard) on top of the bad news, Adam relies on his buddy Kyle (Seth Rogen, spot on) and therapist Katherine (Anna Kendrick) to help him through. Katherine forces Adam to face suppressed truths about love and family (especially rekindling ties with his mother, played by Anjelica Huston), and Kyle helps him live large while he can.


A Golden Globe-nominated performance by Gordon-Levitt was the proverbial spine that held the movie together (and truly, Adam’s spine was, in essence, the crux of the story). He demands attention with his emotionally charged performance, both somber and passionate. We root hard for Adam—not only for his survival but for his love and for his family—and the only way to get an audience that on-board is to completely sell each and every one. And Gordon-Levitt does just that. We feel his pain. His tender and poignant performance is the reason the movie succeeds, but he doesn’t work alone. Rogen is pitch-perfect, hilarious but touching. It couldn’t have been too tough, considering the comedian, a friend of Reiser, went through the actual events inspiring the film. Anjelica Huston, barely recognizable in short blonde hair, gives audiences a reason to shed a tear with her performance as the pitiable mother of a cancer patient. Her tears flow like any loving mother in her situation, but no loving mother is crying in front of cameras with her fake son, an up-and-coming movie stud, lying on the gurney. That takes a little extra effort. And Anna Kendrick is a marvel as the blossoming therapist taking on her third ever patient. Her occasional verbal hesitations are brilliant beyond directing. As Adam’s fellow chemotherapy patients, Philip Baker Hall and Matt Frewer deserve enormous credit for giving this tragic tale some wit, but also some realization. They’re as funny and touching as anyone, but they bring you back to the point of the story. For such small parts, these men packed more than their share of punches.

Whether it was an accurate portrayal or a genius screenwriting decision, Adam’s love life is ideally executed. Love doesn’t happen in 100 minutes, so Reiser takes the romance slowly and realistically.


This story is powerful. It cuts deep, a tragically entertaining piece of art. Reiser walks the fine line between sincerity and comic charm, and never once loses his balance. “50/50” reveals truths in everyone’s life that we didn’t know we knew—it’s hard to watch, but it’s harder not to watch. And its insight doesn’t overshadow the comedy! With one of comedy’s biggest names and a few promising up-and-comers, there will be laughs.

“50/50” caps a good few days of cinematic experiences (three 8’s in a row!). This is a true and honest recommendation; you owe it to yourself to see this film. Just make sure you dry your tears off the disk before putting it back in the case.

6 thoughts on “’50/50′: Odds are, you’ll enjoy it

  1. A good touching film, Joseph Gordon-Levitt picks such good roles and Seth Rogen shows he has good dramatic acting chops.

    1. I was happily surprised with Rogen, and Gordon-Levitt was fantastic. If “EL&IC” verged too far with 9/11, how did “50/50” do with cancer? I think there’s a vast difference, but what are your thoughts?

      1. I agree a vast difference tween showing cancer or for that matter AIDS illnesses be it fact or fictional depictions and fictional stories to do with Sep 11, 2001 attacks. While I generally have no issue with the recreations of factural events to do with 911 the use of images like the planes hitting the Twin Towers or the images of people falling from them is in my opinion capitalising on them for the maker of the book or movie’s profits. Soem images are just too representative of the continuing horror of the tragedy for the victims and their survivors. For EL&IC to use them no matter how supposedly well meaning for an uplifting story; it is still too soon. Maybe it will never be appropriate for those images to be used in a fictional story as far I feel in my sensisibilities. What are your thoughts? Very good question you posed Logon.

        1. I think you may be right that it’s too soon to use the more heart-wrenching images, but eventually it should be acceptable. Images of WWII and internment camps have sometimes been graphic, so eventually you have to think this will be acceptable too. But I agree with you that it’s about the specific images shown.

          1. Good point about WWII images. Schindler’s List has to be one of the most graphic of the horrors of the camps and is also a prime exampe of “Lest we forget”. Perhaps the image of planes hitting the Twin Towers or of people falling from them will in time evoke the same sentiment. However now to use them in a fictional story is just too raw just eleven years later. This kind of conversation is what makes blogging meaningful. Come to think of it perhaps and I’m stretching here maybe the film makers and author of the book EL&IC wanted to prompt these kinds of dialogue.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s